From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Dec 8 23:26:16 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Message-ID: <4398B2CC.9040803@free.fr> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:25:16 +0100 From: Arnaud BERCEGEAY User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-7.1.20060mdk (X11/20050322) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: MiNT List Subject: Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation References: <4397F4C3.7030701@utbm.fr> <1134035229.5776.50.camel@linuxbox> <4398098F.2010604@utbm.fr> <43988E5F.6000201@free.fr> <1134077315.29437.27.camel@linuxbox> <4398ACDC.2020203@free.fr> <1134080134.19887.229.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> In-Reply-To: <1134080134.19887.229.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: arnaud.bercegeay@free.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Hello, >>My point is that the particular WM_REPOSED message (or 'extended' >>WM_SIZED message) is not a 'window option', that's why i don't like that >>much the usage of wind_set() for this particular feature. > > Extended? standard = only widht/heigh may change extended = any of x, y, w, h may change the definition of each data of msgbuff[] is kept unchanged. > XaAES sends all window coordinates as part of WM_SIZED no matter what > right? this is the case for all AES i hope (i'm sure) ! best regards, Arnaud.