From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Jan 12 23:52:52 2006 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de To: From: Peter Slegg Subject: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: XaAES Reply-To: Peter Slegg X-Mailer: MyMAIL Rev:1.86-06.12521 (Atari/(STiK/STinG/GlueSTiK)) X-Hardware: Atari Milan MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:43:20 +0200 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-Id: <0004bf6b.01971e3a3f88@smtp.freeola.net> References: <00037215.018b7e3a2de8@smtp.freeola.net> In-Reply-To: 00037215.018b7e3a2de8@smtp.freeola.net X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, MISSING_MIMEOLE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME X-Spam-Level: * Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de id k0CMqqXL007137 On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:28:08 , Peter Slegg wrote: > To try to dig deeper into my network problems with 1.16 > I thought I would try ping'ing my router with different > sized packets. > > Before testing 1.16 I did a sanity check with 1.15.12 > > The largest packet that worked was 1472 bytes. Anything > larger and there was no repsonse. > > I am going to try again with 1.16 but I just wondered if > this was normal sort of behaviour for ping ?` 1.16 behaves in the same way so it looks like it might be a problem with ping. Peter