From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Apr 13 23:24:30 2006 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Message-ID: <1144963168.443ec060ec94e@webmail2.utbm.fr> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:19:28 +0200 From: "olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr" To: MiNT List Subject: Re: [MiNT] wind_set(WF_TOPMOST) References: <443E0AEB.8050708@utbm.fr> <1144918628.25823.32.camel@linuxbox> <443E1915.5090804@utbm.fr> <1144922563.25823.45.camel@linuxbox> <443E6F3E.3020509@utbm.fr> <1144949935.25823.78.camel@linuxbox> <1144957798.443eab66887d4@webmail2.utbm.fr> <114 In-Reply-To: <1144960795.25823.107.camel@linuxbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.8 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS X-Spam-Level: * Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de id k3DLOTGu005189 ... > > > ex anyplayer play a list of music, it change of title, it could for 3 > second the > > title of the song, some software write time in hard in menu, probably it > could > > be better to be above menu bar, bubble could be display, a lot of softawre > open > > a window in top, to inform of the load of the software (not in our world!) > > etc... Most of time for a short time. > > This is perfectly possible with normal windows, unless I miss the > point. Which is very possible because I dont think I fully understand > what you mean here :) Probably not because an application doing this will give keyboard focus and not need it. > > > Any AES application authors here who can speak their thoughts? I think > the fancyness of this feature vanishes as more and more apps put their > windows in the 'second layer' leaving us with a 'new apps windows in the > second layer and old apps windows in the normal layer' situation where > it is impossible to get the window of an older app to the top. Ofcourse > this is worst case scenario, but without restrictions, a very open one. > > > Best Regards, > Odd Skancke > > > > > > --