From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Wed May 17 09:25:33 2006 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de From: "Maurits van de Kamp" To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] Proposed joystick device standard Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:21:02 +0200 Message-Id: <20060517071957.M8861@revee.com> In-Reply-To: <17009296368759@lycos-europe.com> References: <17009296368759@lycos-europe.com> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.51 20050228 X-OriginatingIP: 80.61.172.72 (maurits) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: maurits@bassment.nu Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: > Shall I interpret the lack of response as "sure PeP, go ahead, use > the Linux v1.xx API"? :-) A lack of response in these cases usually means people don't care what you do until you do it, and then they'll tell you why your choice sucks. ;o) Maurits.