From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sun Jul 9 11:19:10 2006 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de From: Eero Tamminen Organization: Koti To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] SozobonX problems with GEMlib 0.43.6 Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 12:33:28 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <449062B9.2080009@free.fr> <200607080409.51546.oak@helsinkinet.fi> In-Reply-To: <200607080409.51546.oak@helsinkinet.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200607091233.28008.oak@helsinkinet.fi> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: oak@helsinkinet.fi Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Hi, On Saturday 08 July 2006 04:09, Eero Tamminen wrote: > I was trying to use SozobonX version of the GEMlib with SozobonX. > > However, hcc is complaining about the first "typedef struct" in the > mt_gem.h header. It says "syntax (try skipping)" which I assume to mean > that it skipped rest of the include file completely. If I pre-compile (with ipc) all other headers except compiler.h, the program compiles. Strange. > So, I was wondering which version of the SozobonX C-compiler you're using > to produce the SozobonX version of GEMlib and where you got it? My hcc gives V2.00x35 as it's version number. Is there a newer version somewhere? Btw. Is anybody interested about ansified, cleaned up & translated (to English) Ballerburg source e.g. to make it work better with XaAES? - Eero