From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sun Sep 17 20:46:45 2006 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Subject: Re: [MiNT] glibc for m68k/mint? From: Petr Stehlik To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi In-Reply-To: <200609171355.33229.miro.kropacek@gmail.com> References: <200609170306.23477.miro.kropacek@gmail.com> <200609171355.33229.miro.kropacek@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:38:17 +0200 Message-Id: <1158518297.27810.3.camel@joy.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by ms1.avonet.cz id k8HIbK1b024426 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joy@sophics.cz Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET X-Spam-Level: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de id k8HIki0i018568 MiKRO píše v Ne 17. 09. 2006 v 13:55 +0200: > > Is there anything that you are missing? At the moment the mintlib is very > > stable and compatible enough for mostly alÃl unix programs (for the libc > > dependency). > > > no no, i didn't ask because i'm missing something... i was just curious since > i see from time to time glibc updated version XY, new features, bugfixes etc > and mintlib development is still silent. so maybe we have 100% bugfixed libc > who knows ;) Mintlib is actually released from time to time (0.57.6 is less than year old) but I am more concerned about the FreeMiNT kernel - would you believe that last release was made more than 5 years ago? And XaAES release more than three years ago (www.freemint.de). Petr