From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Sun Sep 17 10:02:18 2006
X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Message-ID: <450CFF50.5030109@highlandsun.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 00:54:56 -0700
From: Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060911 Netscape/7.2 (ax) Firefox/1.5 SeaMonkey/1.5a
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?windows-1252?Q?Adam_K=3Fobukowski?= <atari@gabo.pl>
Cc: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] glibc for m68k/mint?
References: <200609170306.23477.miro.kropacek@gmail.com> <1158463555.6524.30.camel@evil.atari-source.com> <450CEF39.3020206@gabo.pl>
In-Reply-To: <450CEF39.3020206@gabo.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: hyc@highlandsun.com
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL,
 BAYES_00
X-Spam-Level: 

Adam K?obukowski wrote:
> Mark Duckworth napisa?(a):
>> Glibc depends heavily upon the linux kernel as far as I know. Without
>> modern kernel interfaces, no modern libc. We need virtual memory. I
>> thought you were working on that :-P
>
> I don't think that dependency is so heavy - libc supports also Hurd 
> and some othere (don't remember now) systems. So it may be pretty 
> portable. Btw. it supports m68k out-of-the-box.
>
Aren't there still archives of this list? These questions have been 
asked and answered before. glibc is several times larger than mintlib, 
and quite a bit slower. It also didn't exist when we first started 
developing MiNT, gcc, and the associated tools. Perhaps people running 
MiNT on fast 68K emulators today don't care so much, but even the 
smallest program linked with glibc would eat up a sizable chunk of an 
Atari ST's RAM...

-- 
  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc
  OpenLDAP Core Team            http://www.openldap.org/project/


