From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Thu Oct 12 19:42:41 2006
X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Subject: Re: [MiNT] What's required to complie a recent XAAES
From: Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.com>
To: tos4ever@telenet.be
Cc: Mint List <mint@fishpool.com>
In-Reply-To: <452e7c66ba3a70@telenet.be>
References: <452E372C.1090103@t-online.de>
	 <1160664807.22685.30.camel@mduckworth.phillypark.net>
	 <452e7c66ba3a70@telenet.be>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+ldgzk+0KBTKgMXjdPG+"
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:31:28 -0400
Message-Id: <1160674289.22685.42.camel@mduckworth.phillypark.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 (2.6.3-1.fc5.5) 
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: mduckworth@atari-source.com
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL,
 BAYES_00
X-Spam-Level: 


--=-+ldgzk+0KBTKgMXjdPG+
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hrmm,

That's interesting, I'll have to check it out.  It does a very basic
string comparison in SQL so it might be sqlite to blame.  There's also a
bunch of logic to handle newer releases of same version, etc so that
could be to blame.  I'll make some testcase packages and check it out in
a couple weeks when I'm done with my current night contracting work.

Thanks,
Mark


On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 18:33 +0200, Martin "Nightowl" Byttebier wrote:
> on Thu 12-10-2006 10:53 Mark Duckworth wrote:
>=20
> >Martin,
> >
> >You might also want to check out "Sparemint Update Manager" a tool I am
> >working on which connects to my new in development (perhaps
> >eternally :-P) sparemint website, http://dev.sparemint.org.  It needs to
> >be download and built yourself with CVS but I released a while ago an
> >alpha build that is an executable here:
> >
> >http://www.atari-source.org/?q=3Dnode/26
> >
> >Look for sum-0.1a.tar.gz.  I don't recall what features were supported
> >in this build but you should be able to go to a command line and type
> >"./sum.prg info" and it should compare your current package set to the
> >server and recommend a series of updates.  If you likes the updates you
> >can do "./sum.prg upgrade" and it will download and upgrade all those
> >packages automagically.  The CVS version has GEM support if no
> >commandline arguments are used, but it's unfinished.  As I recall you
> >can do things like ./sum.prg install sed and it will find the latest
> >version of sed, download and install it.  Usual package manager
> >functionality.
> >
>=20
>=20
> Nice tool that is.=20
> All the packages are up-to-date again now.
> One small problem though.
>=20
> <quote>
> The following packages are newer on the server
>=20
> Package: less-376-1.m68kmint.rpm
>  - Installed: less-381-1.m68kmint.rpm=20
> </quote>
>=20
> Hmm, to me less-381 seems to be newer then less-376-1.=20
>=20
> HTH,
> Martin
> =20

--=-+ldgzk+0KBTKgMXjdPG+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFLnvwG3ekuGovTz0RAjAdAKCPn2VKAhPHbj7ri0tVQdfsvo8JlQCffHoa
4KP8iOwGKIQwBVkG/7Mx1IQ=
=xCkM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-+ldgzk+0KBTKgMXjdPG+--


