From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Jun 28 12:45:07 2007 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:41:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Frank Naumann X-X-Sender: fnaumann@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] slattach In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <200706252132.02183.miro.kropacek@gmail.com> <200706252148.03087.miro.kropacek@gmail.com> <20070626190822.3d2bc9c9.mandin.patrice@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Scan-Signature: a022150cd1739906f2b1b35dbf6369f5 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: fnaumann@boerde.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Hello! >> Do you use the FreeMiNT serial xdd drivers (scc.xdd, mfp.xdd, ...)? > > yes and no :) on falcon freemint + scc.xdd but on megaste sting + hsmodem ( > drvin.prg, scc.prg, mfp.prg). maybe this is the reason but as far as i know, > hsmodem should be as good as scc.xdd at least? >From the performance view hsmodem is as good as the fremint driver. But hsmodem don't integrate very well into freemint (it's designed for TOS/MagiC). Regards, Frank -- ATARI FALCON 060 // MILAN 060 -------------------------------- http://sparemint.atariforge.org/ e-Mail: fnaumann@freemint.de