From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Jan 22 17:25:15 2008 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Message-ID: <1192049107.470d39d362bf2@webmail.utbm.fr> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:45:07 +0200 From: "Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr" To: Jo Even Skarstein Cc: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] SV: How to detect WF_TOPMOST? References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by freemint id m0MGP1YK004618 Status: X-Status: X-Keywords: Selon Jo Even Skarstein : > > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > > Fra: Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr [mailto:Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr] > > Sendt: 10. oktober 2007 20:00 > > > > Here test code, notice that for WF_TOPMOST test is not very needed I think > > Thanks :-) Does this code apply to XaAES as well? I don't know, we have speak about this in past with Odd, I don't know if it include it? > > > because if it doesn't avaible it should not be a problem for AES nor for > > application ! */ > > I tested it under N.AES and could not notice any problems, but I want to > indicate to the user whether this option is available or not. Good Olivier > > Jo Even > > > > --