From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Jan 22 17:25:14 2008 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de From: "Jo Even Skarstein" To: Subject: [MiNT] SV: How to detect WF_TOPMOST? Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:47:29 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 In-Reply-To: <1192042818.470d214289ceb@webmail.utbm.fr> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joska@online.no Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Status: X-Status: X-Keywords: > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > Fra: Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr [mailto:Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr] > Sendt: 10. oktober 2007 20:00 > > Here test code, notice that for WF_TOPMOST test is not very needed I think Thanks :-) Does this code apply to XaAES as well? > because if it doesn't avaible it should not be a problem for AES nor for > application ! */ I tested it under N.AES and could not notice any problems, but I want to indicate to the user whether this option is available or not. Jo Even