From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Jan 22 17:26:59 2008 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Message-ID: <1194001011.472b027311e88@webmail.utbm.fr> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:56:51 +0100 From: "Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr" To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: [MiNT] Technical question about memory protection in Mint MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by freemint id m0MGP1ZM004618 Status: X-Status: X-Keywords: Hello I have a question about memory protection under Mint I'm working with Mint under mode: KERN_SECURITY_LEVEL = 2 end KERN_MPFLAGS = 1 with KERN_MPFLAGS to 1, I have understand that child can't acces of the father memory, this a good thing, but in this case, does father can acces to child memory? As I can see I can access to basepage. Thanks Olivier