From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Jan 22 17:29:31 2008 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de To: From: Peter Slegg Subject: Re: [MiNT] GCC 4.2.2 and binary compatibility Reply-To: Peter Slegg X-Mailer: MyMAIL Rev:1.88.12854 (Atari/(STiK/STinG/GlueSTiK)) X-Hardware: Atari Milan Content-Type: text/plain; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 23:20:32 +0200 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-Id: <002611af.01bb4ae84840@smtp.freeola.net> References: <475850B5.4040802@freesbee.fr> In-Reply-To: 475850B5.4040802@freesbee.fr X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, HEADER_COUNT_CTYPE, MISSING_MIMEOLE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME X-Spam-Level: *** Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by freemint id m0MGP1bA004618 Status: X-Status: X-Keywords: On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:42:45 , Vincent Riviÿre wrote: > >> However, GCC 4.2.2 is now quite stable. > > > > For me too. I've just compiled FreeMiNT CVS with it (with some patching) > > and I'm running with that version right now :-) > > I'm VERY happy to know this :-) ! What a success story ! > You should submit your patches to the FreeMiNT developers. Most of the > times, GCC 4 is more strict than earlier versions, and may be useful to > find potentially dangerous code. > > Someone reported that EmuTOS was successfully compilable (and usable !) > with GCC 4.2.2. > > Really, the next step is to update the MiNTLib ! > > Vincent > I don't know quite how important this is but I know people have been trying to get GCC 4 working for years. Presumably some things that won't compile under the old GCC can now be built ? Well done. Peter