From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Jan 22 17:30:30 2008 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Message-ID: <1197490175.47603fff770b6@webmail.utbm.fr> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:09:35 +0100 From: "Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr" To: mint Subject: Re: [MiNT] GCC and MagiC References: <475FDE69.8080207@freesbee.fr> In-Reply-To: <475FDE69.8080207@freesbee.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by freemint id m0MGP1bp004618 Status: X-Status: X-Keywords: Selon Vincent Rivière : > Hello. > > I've heard many times that the binaries built with GCC (or the cross > tools) does not work with MagiC. > > Does anyone know where the problem comes from ? Is it in the binary file > format outputted by ld ? Or some issue in the MiNTLib ? > > Vincent > > > Hello The only case I have seen trouble is gcc itself (not ld, as ...). I never be able to run gcc 2.95.3 on it, I alway's stay with gcc 2.8.1. Olivier --