From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Jan 22 17:35:45 2008 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Subject: Re: [MiNT] GCC 4.2.2 - Keith's Latest Progress (or lack thereof) From: Alan Hourihane To: Olivier Landemarre Cc: mint In-Reply-To: <4795E83B.6080908@utbm.fr> References: <478A8F44.3030702@freesbee.fr> <47936072.4050702@freesbee.fr> <1200950139.9669.23.camel@localhost> <4795E83B.6080908@utbm.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:30:33 +0000 Message-Id: <1201008633.4076.18.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: alanh@fairlite.demon.co.uk Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by freemint id m0MGP1gU004618 Status: X-Status: X-Keywords: On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 13:57 +0100, Olivier Landemarre wrote: > Alan Hourihane a écrit : > > On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 16:34 -0500, Keith Scroggins wrote: > > > >> Hello all, > >> > >> I'm currently building GCC 4.2.2 under AranyM, still got a ways to go. > >> > >> Otherwise, I built a Canadian Cross build with Vincent's latest tools and > >> packages, and my results were the same it seems, the C compiler seems to > >> work on the small items I test, and the C++ compiler does not seem to work > >> on what I have tested, creating executables that SIGILL (illegal > >> instruction). > >> > > > > Ugh. Same here now. > > > > Since updating GCC & binutils with Vincent's recent updates, the > > FreeMiNT kernel I build is now generating lots of problems. I'm not sure > > what's going on either yet. I'll see if I can backtrack on some of the > > binaries as it used to work. > > > > Alan. > > > > > Hello > > When I compil kernel with gcc 4 for coldfire, I have find some trouble, > one possible trouble is when a Signal occur, when it occur Mint kernel > modify stack position. For coldfire there was not enough stack put here, > I thought it come with 68K emulator even if most of Mint kernel not need > it because it was native, but perhaps it's link to GCC 4 that need > perhaps more stack. You can try find where I have done this patch > (search for #ifdef COLDFIRE and try replace the good one by #if 1, I > don't remember in wich file I have done this patch) I don't think so. As it used to work before Vincent's recent changes. I took a look at your code and it doesn't make sense.... # ifdef COLDFIRE newstack = ((unsigned long) &newcurrent) - 0x40UL - 12UL - 0x100UL; # else newstack = ((unsigned long) &newcurrent) - 0x40UL - 12UL - 0x100UL; # endif Alan.