From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Wed Jan 30 20:11:25 2008
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=df367TolLfk3yNmrxNXUeuE0zmSSAmDXSMtHJO8xOC8=;
        b=tKaueuAy+W4UtJJ3PzsCPGP7FCWfNwmLNbGc6prtp225OGvYcfIxTQ25kxtGHXwcd9LsvJM+VEgV5BhDglKm65FAPF1Lu/CnkNROI1M9oWe5kVqS9z+YJrgYydru6nyIbCpZfry1QazmBXdK5ywCbsYTpmI46lOHPAmaabFoyzw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=lyPNge1v0Wzzd+SxZHGUwY/3TDBnITUTRKYbc4jbo7A8EnIhSnBKlZComl9KQaDHV8DuqOdPYS+lpmOY9uo6h9nTyexGsIoCNbTTa5VQ+oqSoA+OTLSqtnXggMwzXPBQjV5tU0E8gWzaa/JxIw055rWj9VxwO9f3j9GxAVLBuM0=
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:38:52 +0100
From: Thomas Huth <th.huth@googlemail.com>
To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] GCC 4.2.2 RPM build....
Message-ID: <20080131013852.0155dcc6@phineus>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0801291935190.14217@saltmine.radix.net>
References: <479CEF8A.60806@freesbee.fr>
	<003011e7.019a88ca4650@smtp.freeola.net>
	<Pine.GSO.4.63.0801291935190.14217@saltmine.radix.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.12.0; powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: th.huth@googlemail.com
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:40:10 -0500 (EST)
Keith Scroggins <kws@radix.net> wrote:

> Hello Peter,
> 
> > Is there anything we can do that will minimise the amount of work
> > needed when the next release of GCC emerges ?
> 
> Basically just keep the patches up to date.  With each release, the
> major releases (4.x or X.x) will need the most testing, while the
> minor releases (4.2.x) will need little work.

What about getting the patches upstream to the GCC folks? Do they
accept patches from a small community like the m68k-atari-mint ?

 Thomas