From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Jan 22 17:34:09 2008 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) In-Reply-To: <478BDC33.4080101@imperia.net> References: <200801141812.13145.jflemaire@skynet.be> <00027bd0.01a0b2fa1c3e@smtp.freeola.net> <478BC887.2010503@imperia.net> <8C7DA51B-F4E0-4E15-AF00-F3E073F5CB4C@bassment.nu> <478BD57A.6030908@imperia.net> <56280120-0AD6-422A-9E48-E66565056291@bassment.n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <24C459CF-10B9-4193-893A-8ED759513CFB@bassment.nu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Maurits van de Kamp Subject: Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 patch Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:27:26 +0100 To: mint@fishpool.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: maurits@bassment.nu Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Status: X-Status: X-Keywords: >>> IMHO, "canonical" has nothing to do with concatenation. What are >>> "canonical" domain names"? >> >> subdomain.domain.com is a canonical domain name (I guess it's "in the >> same canon" as domain.com, as I wrote previously). > > But this is just a subdomain, isn't it? Yep but the complete name is often called a canonical name. Probably by the same people who insist on calling abbreviations 'acronyms'. (In fact, not even TLA is an acronym). :P Maurits.