From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Feb 12 04:29:06 2008 Message-ID: <47B165E5.60607@freesbee.fr> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:24:53 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vincent_Rivi=E8re?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint Subject: Re: [MiNT] Binutils 2.18 + GCC 4.2.3 References: <47ADDBA8.3050603@freesbee.fr> <47ADE386.8030501@freesbee.fr> <47AF2849.7000404@freesbee.fr> <47B09306.7020407@freesbee.fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2008 09:24:39.0944 (UTC) FILETIME=[17D57080:01C86D59] X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: MiKRO wrote: > Maybe more people should tell their opinion (about > setting the early stack to 64 KB) and then we can commit it. I would like to know exactly what was the problem with the original code. A crash on startup, without explanation, but why ? -- Vincent Rivière