From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Tue Feb  5 07:36:31 2008
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:27:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Keith Scroggins <kws@radix.net>
To: mint <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] strip
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802050806480.3562@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0802050723380.7390@saltmine.radix.net>
References: <47A732CA.9000803@freesbee.fr>  <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802041835130.3562@localhost.localdomain>
 <c6533ef60802041331i1b033c09ue7d09940db5ecc45@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802050806480.3562@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: kws@radix.net
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

Hello Frank,

> From the things I heard on the mailinglist, are the binutils 2.18 stable 
> and work together with gcc 2.95? If yes we can easily update just the 
> binutils. Then there is no conflict at all :-)

They seem to get along with GCC 2.95.3 fine.  I was able to bootstrap one 
of the GCC 4.2.2 revisions with GCC 2.95.3/Binutils 2.18.  I have built 
some libs, and also built the IRC client Rhapsody for someone, and he in 
turned used it in MiNT on his stock TT030.  Not a ton of testing, but 
some.  What other testing should we try in regards to Binutils?

Keith