From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Feb 21 04:17:43 2008 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=XhvYkCwPJsjCda/o8K6g7RtY+xAY3lXubt0LT9mSPPg=; b=dwqythko9EHXbmn0ByodNO6qNYuICtxqJcGPFELmif4WbyEsnf8H5nKGo+XtwJmBQOFYH3mvlaPi9cSur+/VpfMabIdegET/ajz+MQorb8DbcXZDgRtU+epkbg0JflItHYYIJz8VAb161Zz/xrHHh71JcElCMvxcMhIBzRziXRk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=C0UAyl5luYfVTg4qcuzjthBIVsbfhnZrNZwQCczU7K55v/1HbY395vZ0rjwCyoJvi/Hc9RsBb47QbR5Z/flkITV7B+5qZEXgYV4nBvxopehtRePrhhYs52VwsSfubVwO4Fx63822ErCvmRQ9xrG35DMAHyWDsx2q6kKbKfDsDDY= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:11:17 +0100 From: MiKRO To: mint Subject: [MiNT] Newest GCC + Binutils compile status MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3481_20137079.1203585077261" X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: miro.kropacek@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: ------=_Part_3481_20137079.1203585077261 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, this morning I've found quite "interesting" error -- I've made classic combination gcc/binutils with -m68060 this time in one go and in stage3 for binutils compilation stopped in bfd/archive.c saying about a loooot of stuff statically declared with no definition (it was warnings but "warning are treated as errors") and the output begins with something like ":" (sorry for such lame description, I was in hurry, it was just quick look) -- could it be something with that 68060 flag? As I wrote earlier, I managed to do this compilation with no single error without playing with BOOT_CFLAGS. Only thing I was able to do was to remove binutils from gcc tree, delete all objs and restart the compilation (still with -m68060 flag) to see what happens. -- MiKRO / Mystic Bytes http://mikro.atari.org ------=_Part_3481_20137079.1203585077261 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi,

this morning I've found quite "interesting" error -- I've made classic combination gcc/binutils with -m68060 this time in one go and in stage3 for binutils compilation stopped in bfd/archive.c saying about a loooot of stuff statically declared with no definition (it was warnings but "warning are treated as errors") and the output begins with something like "<buitin-0>:" (sorry for such lame description, I was in hurry, it was just quick look) -- could it be something with that 68060 flag? As I wrote earlier, I managed to do this compilation with no single error without playing with BOOT_CFLAGS.

Only thing I was able to do was to remove binutils from gcc tree, delete all objs and restart the compilation (still with -m68060 flag) to see what happens.

--
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org ------=_Part_3481_20137079.1203585077261--