From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Apr 10 12:31:52 2008 From: Ronald Hall Organization: DarkForce! To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] Anyone using N.AES? Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:27:01 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20784178.1457681207741124421.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice10.nsc.no> In-Reply-To: <20784178.1457681207741124421.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice10.nsc.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804101127.01848.darklord@suddenlink.net> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: darklord@suddenlink.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: On Wednesday 09 April 2008 07:38 am, Jo Even Skarstein wrote: > It just occured to me yesterday that I haven't used N.AES since 2006. I had > to do some testing under N.AES and it struck me how old it felt. I would > assume that most MiNT-users have switched to XaAES or MyAES by now. Is > there a point in me spending time testing my code under N.AES? Anyone still > using N.AES? > > Jo Even I have to admit, I've still got it installed on my CT60 Falcon. Its my own fault though, its installed and working so I just never got around to upgrading/updating to the newer stuff. Guess I'll have to get my lazy carcass in gear and play with the new stuff. :) -- _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ _/ Welcome To DarkForce! www.darkforce.org "The Fuji Lives!"_/ _/ An Atari SW/HW based BBS-Telnet:darkforce-bbs.dyndns.org _/ _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/