From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sun Apr 20 10:33:54 2008 X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYBAJbrCkhR9tSo/2dsb2JhbAAIqSQ From: "J. F. Lemaire" To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] binutils 2.18 cross-rpm Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:08:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <4804D6D2.4080902@freesbee.fr> <48073300.8010205@freesbee.fr> <200804172117.26593.jflemaire@skynet.be> In-Reply-To: <200804172117.26593.jflemaire@skynet.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804201608.07922.jflemaire@skynet.be> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: jflemaire@skynet.be Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: On Thursday 17 April 2008, J. F. Lemaire wrote: > On Thursday 17 April 2008, Vincent Rivière wrote: > > Note, Jean-François: you reported that with the last MiKRO packages: > > > - the -s option given to GCC does not seem to result in > > > stripping the binaries. > > > > Do you experience the same thing with your current setup ? > > Actually GCC 2.95 + binutils 2.18 > > No, everything is fine. The problem seems to be with GCC itself, not > the binutils. > > Incidentally, executing the "strip" command on the executable > compiled with the -s option gets rid of some additional kbytes of > data. I don't know if that's significant, though. And I seem to > remember it was the same before -- I mean before GCC 4 and the > updated binutils. Just an update to say that I've found that the reason for that strange behaviour was in my buggy makefile. It's fixed now and I'll go fix my own behaviour :-) JFL -- Jean-François Lemaire