From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Wed Apr  9 09:12:44 2008
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:38:44 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>
To: <mint@fishpool.com>
Message-ID: <20784178.1457681207741124421.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice10.nsc.no>
Subject: [MiNT] Anyone using N.AES?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_147106_5126138.1207741124416"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Mailer: Mobile Office v1.44 (Telenor Nordic)
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: joska@online.no
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

------=_Part_147106_5126138.1207741124416
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

It just occured to me yesterday that I haven't used N.AES since 2006. I had to do some testing under N.AES and it struck me how old it felt. I would assume that most MiNT-users have switched to XaAES or MyAES by now. Is there a point in me spending time testing my code under N.AES? Anyone still using N.AES?

Jo Even

------=_Part_147106_5126138.1207741124416--