From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Wed Apr  9 10:49:09 2008
Message-ID: <47FCCC71.7070205@atari-source.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:02:25 -0400
From: Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>
CC: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Anyone using N.AES?
References: <20784178.1457681207741124421.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice10.nsc.no>
In-Reply-To: <20784178.1457681207741124421.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice10.nsc.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: mduckworth@atari-source.org
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

Jo Even Skarstein wrote:
> It just occured to me yesterday that I haven't used N.AES since 2006. I had to do some testing under N.AES and it struck me how old it felt. I would assume that most MiNT-users have switched to XaAES or MyAES by now. Is there a point in me spending time testing my code under N.AES? Anyone still using N.AES?
>
> Jo Even
>   
XaAES here.  I don't see the point in testing for N.Aes, but MagiC on 
the other hand is all I run on my ST/STe's

Thanks,
Mark