From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Wed Apr 9 12:31:59 2008 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XxQ6xcqM5g4dBQ4BXn4uuHCbPHKScCfiyCfpfy1C2qI=; b=gyh2EUGXxAmoy12ssX+Jg3kfMJ8tVGnjcTqIG1wDrx4zOVm/8dVJb/U07vd7l2qNFeaVrUlROf0EbT1HF12hFOtRBbBTo/ueE6JIf3qHJcTjjC/RP7a8f2sbHKIF/0lljvHzfAMilW9lVKS8Yhwx9YzCPKS1ahxpq4DNB3SfXpQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=K9tXPuOEBDR+ZmLQc6wfee19lGNeczR5InQXYenUkwyQb4ngKD4x/Sh2yEYpeHJdza2Q0m1MYoVzClw9d657kGL2tKvFqaXC3NYxLjcesYmXof0DZFq/PCIyj4Mnr/dXhWodgUJzvw18lVU8JEOEq4Qsq0aVfxhnQ9AN9EgDXog= Message-ID: <47FCED3A.2080900@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:22:18 +0200 From: MiKRO Organization: Mystic Bytes User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lonny Pursell CC: "[MiNT] Mailing-List" Subject: Re: [MiNT] Anyone using N.AES? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: miro.kropacek@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: > I still use a working n.aes setup. It's rock solid so I have not switched. > > That means you find XaAES not rock solid? I really can't remember when I saw XaAES crash... if something bad happend, it was always some dirty application's fault... -- MiKRO / Mystic Bytes http://mikro.atari.org