From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Wed Apr 9 15:17:48 2008 Message-ID: <47FCFA71.6020504@atari-hcm.de> Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:18:41 +0200 From: Holger Schreiner User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: MiNT Mailing List Subject: Re: [MiNT] Anyone using N.AES? References: <20784178.1457681207741124421.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice10.nsc.no> In-Reply-To: <20784178.1457681207741124421.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice10.nsc.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/ac6/cIFIul5XiABnApqL2mTh4c6RaLNlFOsG OLSDd/oFkTsXFsYEv3fme6xM8X88l86xcJr+tyFvMKgJVtsi3p ijGOjWAxQtiKhfPFXJuU7n11ziQS+hj X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: h.schreiner@atari-hcm.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Hi, I'm using N.AES with my Hades because Xaaes is not installable (white Screen). I use mint.prg version 1.16 with the newest paket, (not mintnp) therefor my system is very stable. Holger > It just occured to me yesterday that I haven't used N.AES since 2006. I had to do some testing under N.AES and it struck me how old it felt. I would assume that most MiNT-users have switched to XaAES or MyAES by now. Is there a point in me spending time testing my code under N.AES? Anyone still using N.AES? > > Jo Even >