From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Wed Sep 3 13:31:15 2008 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:47:39 +0200 (MEST) From: Jo Even Skarstein To: mint Message-ID: <16296150.155691220456859560.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice8.nsc.no> In-Reply-To: <48BDAD18.2070509@gmail.com> References: <16227226.109651220388178642.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice8.nsc.no> <48BDAD18.2070509@gmail.com> Subject: [MiNT] SV: SV: XaAES gradient problem with 1.17.x kernel MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_15758_31097764.1220456859555" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Mailer: Mobile Office v1.47 (Telenor Nordic) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joska@online.no Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: ------=_Part_15758_31097764.1220456859555 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > From: Miro Kropacek [miro.kropacek@gmail.com] > Sent: 2008-09-02 23:16:08 CEST > To: Jo Even Skarstein [joska@online.no] > Cc: mint [mint@fishpool.com] > Subject: Re: [MiNT] SV: XaAES gradient problem with 1.17.x kernel > I suppose you're talking about 1.17 kernel, right? Yes, I run a fairly recent 1.17 on my Milan and on my Falcon040. The Milan is running MVDI with NVDI on top. > pixelformat detected. The system call which fails (returns bad value for > pixelformat) is of course... VDI call. So I'm pretty confused. Which call is this and what is the expected result? Jo Even ------=_Part_15758_31097764.1220456859555--