From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Wed Sep 10 04:09:54 2008 X-Authentication-Warning: antyk.obta.uw.edu.pl: draco owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:57:42 +0200 (CEST) From: "Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" To: Miro Kropacek cc: mint Subject: Re: [MiNT] Supexec taking one VBL? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080910095534.W31344@antyk.obta.uw.edu.pl> References: <48C415D6.605@gmail.com> <20080908103312.C46235@antyk.obta.uw.edu.pl> <48C5617D.5060007@gmail.com> <20080909104743.Q83829@antyk.obta.uw.edu.pl> <20080909115952.R83829@antyk.obta.uw.edu.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: draco@obta.uw.edu.pl Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: > own specific code in VBL. And even when we find a way how to do it, we're > back in the beginning -- such coder could write bad (leading to crash) code > which will take whole kernel down and this is the current situation with > Super()-ised democode. This is life. :) A TSR required to run some types of software is not something that couldn't work - remember the DOS4GW, that you needed to install on a PC (in pre-W95 era) to run some games. The "only" problem is to make the TSR universal enough. Pozdrawiam KMK