From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Fri Oct 10 14:29:21 2008 X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAK8570hR9tM7/2dsb2JhbACBcrtLgWw From: "J. F. Lemaire" To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:26:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <200810101714.03064.jflemaire@skynet.be> <48EF9B1C.1090204@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <48EF9B1C.1090204@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810102026.00838.jflemaire@skynet.be> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: jflemaire@skynet.be Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: On Friday 10 October 2008, Miro Kropacek wrote: > > I wouldn't mind helping with that, now that my 100Mhz/512Mb Falcon > > has proper access to the Internet. > > The problem isn't performance power, I was talking about cross > compiling so every build was matter of seconds, 1-2 minutes at max. Isn't compiling on the target platform simpler? > The problem for me was that boring work around -- setting right > directories, scripts, flags, comments, patch order, maintaining all > this etc... when you look at the real count of people able to do it I > think it's out of question there's a chance to produce more than > 20-30 > full-tested-and-working RPMs before everyone gets bored ;-) Yes, I can understand that. -- Jean-François Lemaire