From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Mon Oct 13 13:39:03 2008 X-ME-UUID: 20081013160508232.38A387000084@mwinf2b07.orange.fr Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:04:50 +0200 From: Patrice Mandin To: Jo Even Skarstein Cc: mint Subject: Re: [MiNT] SV: Some comments on gcc 4.3.2 Message-Id: <20081013180450.06b84f0f.mandin.patrice@orange.fr> In-Reply-To: <24709273.2103601223840146355.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice8.nsc.no> References: <20081010123824.03e0a925.mandin.patrice@orange.fr> <20081012174247.649c4ed3.mandin.patrice@orange.fr> <24709273.2103601223840146355.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice8.nsc.no> Organization: Chez moi X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: mandin.patrice@orange.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id m9DHd255025912 Le Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:35:46 +0200 (MEST) Jo Even Skarstein a _crit: > > From: Patrice Mandin [mandin.patrice@orange.fr] > > Sent: 2008-10-12 17:42:47 CEST > > To: mint [mint@fishpool.com] > > Subject: Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2 > > > > Yep, I know, ldg is just a hack, but it's better than nothing :-[. > > What's the advantage of using LDG instead of SLB? Simply I don't know how a SLB is supposed to be created :). And one thing missing in SLB, is a getFunctionPointerByName() to retrieve the pointer to the function given its name, in the shared library. In SLB, you must know the function number to call the right function. I think it should be possible to create a SLB generator, and create a loader as a libxxx.a like I did for SDL.ldg. -- Patrice Mandin WWW: http://pmandin.atari.org/ Programmeur Linux, Atari Spécialité: Développement, jeux