From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sun Oct 12 15:41:01 2008 Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:35:46 +0200 (MEST) From: Jo Even Skarstein To: mint Message-ID: <24709273.2103601223840146355.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice8.nsc.no> In-Reply-To: <20081012174247.649c4ed3.mandin.patrice@orange.fr> References: <20081010123824.03e0a925.mandin.patrice@orange.fr> <20081012174247.649c4ed3.mandin.patrice@orange.fr> Subject: [MiNT] SV: Some comments on gcc 4.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_212901_1097524.1223840146349" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Mailer: Mobile Office v1.47 (Telenor Nordic) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joska@online.no Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: ------=_Part_212901_1097524.1223840146349 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > From: Patrice Mandin [mandin.patrice@orange.fr] > Sent: 2008-10-12 17:42:47 CEST > To: mint [mint@fishpool.com] > Subject: Re: [MiNT] Some comments on gcc 4.3.2 > > Yep, I know, ldg is just a hack, but it's better than nothing :-[. What's the advantage of using LDG instead of SLB? Jo Even ------=_Part_212901_1097524.1223840146349--