From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Sat Oct 18 15:57:02 2008
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
         :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=K1SeTNNIUZM8uIwCWxYJMc5FMXoxAUz7/TiRWBwQ7F8=;
        b=nVeQkNpnUozXc0B0ClMjj6BrdB5IeNmM1V4ksuxZDR7L7C5soAi2ybro7loGOX65KF
         BJfYA5dzVHKzLQSiHWcLLNiApUHKvy/C2iduNkaFQ8Gt3gQN2JrTmIMeNNyeSHiJS8P7
         MCUI9W3SoUIyPnlOtFJYD7n29kvk3p/KQOCYI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to
         :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ilNWamYqpa54Q/SbYJC/1VlFMPx2iaUZGZej7O44IlFfpK2vvoPEHPiHDi/e2xEPes
         xaHRw03kpAoOKQFD7LdESG7SKF/fRsSQSgQ9rCqHMZ7kk1m+/Ny15Oo5k1Mu/ASWIfJm
         IqqyogZnQEzG9PpQPCn5vDkm0OyQ0ID7g1UlU=
Message-ID: <48FA3E48.1060509@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:51:36 +0200
From: Miro Kropacek <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
Organization: Mystic Bytes
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mint <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: [MiNT] gdb & gcc 4.3.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: miro.kropacek@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

Hi,

is there anyone who uses gdb along with our newest gcc? I have quite a 
problem to use it on regular base -- at first, it seems like gdb doesn't 
like c99's mixed code with declarations. But when I removed all such 
code I realized it's general problem with { } blocks -- everytime 
debugger should enter some {} section (for(), if(), ...) it crashes at 
some strange (low) address saying it can't place breakpoint there. As 
soon as I replace $(CC) with /usr/bin/gcc (original gcc) it works...

That reminds me, Vincent, how are you doing with your work on the newest 
gdb? ;)

-- 
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org