From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Nov 13 07:02:28 2008 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:59:52 +0100 (MET) From: Jo Even Skarstein To: Message-ID: <12366273.6872791226577592401.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice10.nsc.no> In-Reply-To: <1226566893.7697.12.camel@petr> References: <1226332685.22335.46.camel@petr> <0011ab30.019ae8ca329e@smtp.freeola.net> <491A010E.6030309@atari-source.org> <23904566.6704441226477635811.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice6.nsc.no> <1226490340.6367.7.camel@petr> <6704587.6820001226563504475.JavaMail.adm-moff@moffice5.nsc.no> <1226566893.7697.12.camel@petr> Subject: [MiNT] SV: SV: SV: OT Highwire MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_695730_21841961.1226577592396" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Mailer: Mobile Office v1.47 (Telenor Nordic) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joska@online.no Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: ------=_Part_695730_21841961.1226577592396 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > From: Petr Stehlik [pstehlik@sophics.cz] > Sent: 2008-11-13 10:01:33 CET > To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi > Subject: Re: [MiNT] SV: SV: OT Highwire > > Anyway, Dillo was just an idea of a real small and lightweight browser. Dillo is small and lightweight, but it's also more limited than HighWire (no CSS and no frames/iframes). If we want to spend efforts on porting a web browser it should atleast have some advantages over the stuff we already have. > Webkit would be much better rendering engine to start with. And you > could even write the UI around it in pure AES ;-) I am just trying to be > realistic here, given the available manpower and CPU horsepower... How realistic is it to port WebKit or Gecko to MiNT? I wouldn't mind writing the GUI for a web-browser if we have a good rendering engine available. Jo Even ------=_Part_695730_21841961.1226577592396--