From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Fri Dec 26 05:33:34 2008
Subject: Re: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)
From: Petr Stehlik <pstehlik@sophics.cz>
To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-Reply-To: <8cf5b8cc0812260209k328f370j88ae2a30644698d3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3312992540.1174087984@192.168.178.12>
	 <C577F521.151F4%atari@bright.net>
	 <8cf5b8cc0812260209k328f370j88ae2a30644698d3@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2"
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 11:31:02 +0100
Message-Id: <1230287462.7050.4.camel@joy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2 
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: pstehlik@sophics.cz
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id mBQAXXRS007995

David Galvez píše v Pá 26. 12. 2008 v 11:09 +0100:

> Which one is more advanced now? oVDI or fVDI? If fVDI is the most
> advanced and seeing that there are few developers left, wouldn't be a
> better idea to make it the default free VDI for MiNT so less work must
> to be done?

I don't know anything about oVDI. As for fVDI we use it in ARAnyM's
AFROS for 7 years without major problems and I think the fVDI is also
included in CT60's modified TOS. It also has several hardware
accelerated drivers available.

Petr