From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Wed Dec 10 16:52:00 2008
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:28:33 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vincent_Rivi=E8re?= <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Incompatibility between FPU and non FPU code
In-reply-to: <20081210213933.4d7e2b34.mandin.patrice@orange.fr>
To: Mint list <mint@fishpool.com>
Message-id: <49403481.7070409@freesbee.fr>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
References: <20081210213933.4d7e2b34.mandin.patrice@orange.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

Patrice Mandin a wrote :
 > Current ABI for non-FPU code is to have return value in d0; of course,
 > FPU code expects return value in fp0 register.

I may have misconfigured GCC 4.X about this float ABI.
I'm not sure it behaves like GCC 2.95.

-- 
Vincent Rivière