From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Mon Jan 19 14:59:56 2009 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=R2+Rxz273sABkrZTT5JsT+miHs0N+67BrdQsLKtHlB8=; b=kmBdJf+e415sQ8VLNA2Z6f89dGCcqpA9ur4ZcIF+8Q5Y7XZO4OqpguPxO0/tmYfwy4 +hfsyEY2m7wpOL+dN+xNy+KRCnaINWnmcP0Y5AitIEzeREqNVJ5SM8+iYaC2C6Lu3SC7 6PgWuzBZPTirH+8Htfm2NEiAhrp/bhepvXoIY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=bED2HrrzxEiRpJlyzIhRZzjDAk8REl1WYEGo+No7ZCOTXi5g9Uw6R2iuoRX/wOFpPD QM72/SogaAJmLm4ZAipKE/xrb8FYY3oxkbU7/F28KPofe/skgM70FnqzM/cqFkc6GhlA 7QLME3eQcuOI8Sl1sGVUrjXVmPanq7k2Ut48I= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:50:35 +0100 From: "Miro Kropacek" To: "Alan Hourihane" Subject: Re: [MiNT] ethernat download speed Cc: mint In-Reply-To: <1232324142.13112.0.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_16114_15407761.1232394635634" References: <1232324142.13112.0.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: miro.kropacek@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: ------=_Part_16114_15407761.1232394635634 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline > Sometimes it's 100KB/s and other times it's 900KB/s. Never got as high > as 1500KB/s though. I did do one more experiment -- I took easymint aranym image (gcc 2.95, some old kernel and mintlib) and compiled freemint kernel + drivers from scratch. Luckily, your fixes works OK (i.e. fast) for all my tests. As soon as I replaced inet4.xdd and/or ethernat.xif with gcc4 version, some very visible performance losses appeared... Try the the same and I'm sure you'll get 1.5 MB/s as well. (of course, your ftp server must be reliable). Btw, try it with direct cable connection, as evil pointed out at ct60 bbs, every connection trough gateway is much slower than direct one in mintnet. So it seems we're going to be stuck with old 2.95 for some time yet... -- MiKRO / Mystic Bytes http://mikro.atari.org ------=_Part_16114_15407761.1232394635634 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Sometimes it's 100KB/s and other times it's 900KB/s. Never got as high
as 1500KB/s though.
I did do one more experiment -- I took easymint aranym image (gcc 2.95, some old kernel and mintlib) and compiled freemint kernel + drivers from scratch. Luckily, your fixes works OK (i.e. fast) for all my tests. As soon as I replaced inet4.xdd and/or ethernat.xif with gcc4 version, some very visible performance losses appeared... Try the the same and I'm sure you'll get 1.5 MB/s as well. (of course, your ftp server must be reliable). Btw, try it with direct cable connection, as evil pointed out at ct60 bbs, every connection trough gateway is much slower than direct one in mintnet.

So it seems we're going to be stuck with old 2.95 for some time yet...


--
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org
------=_Part_16114_15407761.1232394635634--