From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Sun May  3 18:23:36 2009
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject
         :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=KRV9SjvVLRY5NzSOteip9w4Ktxe2yydiV8SEpGFcCnE=;
        b=o1WmOBBSFLyOKG6EeWyq3a9nfA2CrJqYnCgtxoTHeqTTBoNfVztdDRAo0hLj+TubdK
         2an2F/AfFHoFowRSkPn/JEa2qdsRK4BipKU3pu2aNTO/vrAg8h7r8/9AK8JSjj7omSrW
         QDFPlm0ZqCvDVythfnAx+i4MY10XMh6QS7+lw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=omvd5eWxXTB3/Y8DTQUs8GmkMPOs7zN6YheYnQIB4jJMDCicbx47USM05db6ze9IB/
         bvf3pMENp4ZNCUTR6zzrCEhOVOH6BmdOfRPewj01nRYbJlBECwhKSpHLl6Fj+qsZo0Hb
         X9ZQJVuGVwM0WPevGc/fxiHPmIm1QiPDYoQ+Q=
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:21:01 +0200
From: Thomas Huth <th.huth@googlemail.com>
To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] EmuTOS for ColdFire
Message-ID: <20090504002101.44c5748c@phineus>
In-Reply-To: <3324145282.1572980930@[192.168.178.12]>
References: <C61D85E7.16762%atari@bright.net>
	<68EF70E911F44CB4AC7C90F286219FC1@joevenlt>
	<49F8D39B.3080303@chello.nl>
	<3324014950.7760261950@[192.168.178.12]>
	<20090501111726.70e28da6@phineus>
	<3324108430.345782912@[192.168.178.12]>
	<49FC2D44.5040707@freesbee.fr>
	<3324145282.1572980930@[192.168.178.12]>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.6.1 (GTK+ 2.16.1; powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: th.huth@googlemail.com
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id n43MNai1026217

On Sat, 2 May 2009 21:41:22 +0200
Gerhard Stoll <gerhard_stoll@gmx.de> wrote:

> Vincent Rivière wrote:
> 
> > The ColdFire family must not be seen like the successor of the
> > 680x0 family, but like some kind of cousin.
> 
> What I mean is, if a program use the _CPU cookie to test what
> stackframe the CPU have or some other functions. Is then five ok or
> not?

I think you can ignore the "5" for the _CPU cookie in EmuTOS. The
current code does not run on ColdFire anyway.
If EmuTOS really runs on ColdFire one day, I think we should choose a
proper value for the _CPU cookie, for example the reset value of D0
which contains the ColdFire core version and some other useful
information (see ColdFire Family Programmer's Reference Manual by
Freescale).

 Thomas