From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sat May 2 15:26:43 2009 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=FGFUh1UO3jMPYYdoZaX6eY0l8qN1dAT8B4aJqYbRYwE=; b=WZS3+jBCCUTTH/IZdXA48FwicxxTgXnlWsz/APhymQkshBYKqBCQ8n0/sJ8AekkKBw u76U0xSiP03x0hQNK5pWD3m+h7HJU/2X05CommVeA/+8hk+RF4wgyVCfiRTou/AlfR8s lJAxBu2Z758mBL3VTWy1RZJbBgQausYUDOVUA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=hD2VQ/OheF4UoRm66/0LIu3iMx3hV2LivTL2ATLivo0XZnnJ1YTp9TIpqKA+GoMNTX Y0Jp8Qz6rUDhV1exyO7LuQG/MMBKM/phxwx7iFLI/ObAyFvve/VhMwcBpbyqeFE2I+Pv WbhOKkSS9Em9w71ldkZhdiXnkCATbCoybIaHA= Message-Id: From: Peter Persson To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi In-Reply-To: <1241289602.5552.7.camel@joy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [MiNT] EmuTOS for ColdFire Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 21:20:51 +0200 References: <68EF70E911F44CB4AC7C90F286219FC1@joevenlt> <49F8D39B.3080303@chello.nl> <3324014950.7760261950@[192.168.178.12]> <20090501111726.70e28da6@phineus> <3324108430.345782912@[192.168.178.12]> <49FC2D44.5040707@freesbee.fr> <609C3308-4B63-4A2E-BEEC-22D7ED26D215@mubf.de> <1241289602.5552.7.camel@joy> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: pep.fishmoose@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: 2 maj 2009 kl. 20.40 skrev Petr Stehlik: > And that would mean crippled binaries for old Atari users. 8/16/32 MHz > just got even slower. I was under the impression that this thread was about running apps and OS on the ColdFire. Either I fail to spot the relevance of your statement - in this context - or maybe I misinterpret it alltogether. It's not entirely uncommon to release several sets of binaries optimized for different CPUs, or to have different routines internally for different CPUs. It's definitely possible to make binaries which run fairly well on 68k as well as ColdFire, and in case there is a point in doing so - noone prevents coders from creating separate binaries. -- PeP