From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Mon Jun 15 14:47:13 2009
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Corruption of high TPA
From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>
To: Vincent =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rivi=E8re?= <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
Cc: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-Reply-To: <4A368F0B.10901@freesbee.fr>
References: <4A2ED03D.1090600@freesbee.fr>
	 <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906101033540.29737@antyk.ibi.uw.edu.pl>
	 <4A2F7B9F.3010100@freesbee.fr>  <4A30FE49.3050404@freesbee.fr>
	 <1244725809.15756.100.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk>
	 <4A310791.2020709@freesbee.fr>
	 <1244728568.15756.106.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk>
	 <4A311332.90806@freesbee.fr>
	 <1244731278.15756.109.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk>
	 <1244748327.4731.8.camel@joy>  <4A316B4E.7020303@freesbee.fr>
	 <1244788520.12354.27.camel@petr>  <4A320C47.5090909@freesbee.fr>
	 <1244794878.12354.35.camel@petr>  <4A321C86.6000608@freesbee.fr>
	 <1244798663.29866.2.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk>
	 <4A3222A8.6060406@freesbee.fr> <4A32B52B.7030605@freesbee.fr>
	 <4A32CDB6.3050706@freesbee.fr>  <4A368F0B.10901@freesbee.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:44:43 +0100
Message-Id: <1245091483.22869.0.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: alanh@fairlite.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id n5FIlC1T013977

On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 20:12 +0200, Vincent Rivière wrote:
> > This is a patch for the MiNTLib as a workaround to that OS bug.
> 
> Any comments about this patch ?
> 
> I "wasted" 64 bytes from any new stack in the setstack() function, and I did 
> the same when the stack pointer is set directly.
> With that, it does not crash anymore.

Committed.

Thanks Vincent.

Alan.


