From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Oct 1 10:35:22 2009 Message-ID: <4AC4BDB2.1090401@atari-source.org> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:33:22 -0400 From: Mark Duckworth User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Hourihane CC: mint Subject: Re: [MiNT] GCC 4.x Include Problems References: <4AC4B739.8020400@atari-source.org> <1254407394.27700.9.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1254407394.27700.9.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Score: -1.4 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: mduckworth@atari-source.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Alan Hourihane wrote: > On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 10:05 -0400, Mark Duckworth wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> Problems with Keith's gcc builds... >> >> gcc 4.2.2 seems to have a prefix for /usr/local rather than /usr which >> causes it to hunt for limits.h and friends in >> /usr/local/lib/gcc/m68k-atari-mint/4.2.2/include rather than /usr/lib. >> I had to make a symlink to /usr/local to make it work. So I moved onto >> gcc 4.4.0. That is hunting for limits.h inside the similar >> /usr/lib/gcc/m68k-atari-mint/4.4.0/include but that file is actually >> located at >> /usr//lib/gcc/m68k-atari-mint/4.4.0/install-tools/include/limits.h >> >> Because on my linux box gcc 4.4.1 the limits.h is locted under >> ...../include rather than ..../install-tools/include I consider this a >> packaging or deployment issue? I will attempt to copy the install-tools >> includes over and it should probably work I think... >> >> I am working with gcc 2.95.3 uninstalled. I don't see any reason we >> shouldn't move past using that old compiler. Does anyone else? It is >> just the compiler after all and the gcc 2.95.3 c++ has been proven to be >> buggy when using high level features. >> > > Gentoo allows multiple GCC targets to be installed and easily switch > between. > > Alan. > > I realize that but I do want to make sure that they work individually so that one is not depending on some random thing from another... which seems to maybe be what happened More importantly, I simply didn't have gcc installed on this aranym instance before ;) Thanks, Mark