From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Dec 1 06:30:19 2009 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KTdXxTcBNi++ZirdlpJWTcdCJtj0zZ7p82t1Z1GOf58=; b=B5fKjAgXYP1Wtu2NcCVevuhNthDgf73LvChHSlhY7N9TOszJyp+1LoWO8AL0fkJBCk WtCGvbAFLL3QiPkQpLEL2Dklu4s1UNTZfS1Ibp3nLpEyMivMDN5CWWJEfX0P64PwuZ72 Kfm2N0FD58VCIt17QuUs9mwfmhK3Jtjq7onvQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Cj+587PIzI+Uwr9b1hhnASTk5paJGuZakwtaAvyxRhGNapF/cqKVNnGOqRQm2fWD33 ZFlaeoCLRu8eOC3kbiZ7xHfSzaoF69g2qp+Kly91c2pxMSqk6eK19nQrb9gRHbrVgwLv 8SWaL8Pd4Nm7GdX3CXuYbtMUQqsNJPqeh6P7Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5A07AB35BFAE49969C2E6C2B10E9114C@mercatus.local> References: <5A07AB35BFAE49969C2E6C2B10E9114C@mercatus.local> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:27:23 +1100 Message-ID: <11a6f2b10912010327r19e6622dx8f13802690e40980@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [MiNT] XaAES: detect pixel-format-problem From: Paul Wratt To: mint Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: paul.wratt@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: hey, I know I should check first and see where it used, but in XA_GLOBAL.C "do_vdi_trap" is parsed out in 1.17, but that does not mean it is being used in 1.16 EDIT: a file search does not turn anything up, another dead end I will try looking through gemx as Jo pointed out. It may or maynot turn something up.. I have some more questions regarding 1.17 and this pixel format issue Are there any known 1.17 builds where gradients and textures were visible? Are there any setups where this problem is not present, like a falcon/CT6x setup maybe? Paul