From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Tue Dec  8 04:24:22 2009
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=rmDuw3EzCVbD5ywyKwDB1EJzFwdBgYA/BY2cCqKj/Lg=;
        b=eGdg2igHZ1myjOXSCQEnxPfMTQI4ffVPCAlVlmGnmOEjTTCTEfaPXA/rFqlKA43FeJ
         y5+I8C1tkYbmczexkzHa6rLV/T+heYpecemhxH/ioeS9jojc2i/dqvw4EvUXNG+1hVfA
         p8Gfk4AlSf5gtY8CzLlbWHocK3EifTjoMU7O0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=OxpPBGx2YHKdTUDC4Un30eze2EXKHVL4DvTtQtndeCBPN1QJYPv+fkS9NsnxGchCyo
         wc2So6fBmLN0rCTfkbam3YDqmU6j94ON1oe6NoMu7vF06iKZbafOB46QXjA01CB1nQUa
         S36gfJjYrnpvOti/Bkk7nx1qg4Gw5OIBdZ0QM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c6533ef60912072345r5e0d5fa8rc6c6299611843c0b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <11a6f2b10912072105sc529df0y74ce350e4fc5051@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c6533ef60912072345r5e0d5fa8rc6c6299611843c0b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:22:07 +1100
Message-ID: <11a6f2b10912080122x2640acbay666ea1f13f3c68f@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] precompiler kernel source compares
From: Paul Wratt <paul.wratt@gmail.com>
To: mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: paul.wratt@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Miro Kropacek <miro.kropacek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> a resulting diff between a "good" 040 kernel may show something, also
>> a diff at the same level against the same kernel from 1.16 may also
>> turn some thing up..
>
> I don't think this is really necessary. Unless you don't want to compare
> kernels from MMU/stack frame point of view, there's a very few changes, even
> related to Aranym. You can use full sources with no problem. But if you
> really want to, you can always make simple shell/perl/python script which
> cut out everything non-related to 040/aranym/whatever (i.e. checking for
> that #ifdefs)
> --
> MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
> http://mikro.atari.org
>

nice idea, thanks

its just to check if what differences there are between 040 and ARAnyM
sources (I dont feel up to wading through all those kernel files
looking for a "needle in the haystack", especially when I dont know
what the "needle" will look like)

Paul