From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Sat Dec 12 14:27:39 2009
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=yWiabeILUHVhB+9zW6YK7sSdBdzuHixqI5fg5tV8gOo=;
        b=rRERr3bwbD+ZIIBRIj6IF71V/pnRtIOUvIxyD5bJkV6I+tdqIYu8SwF5zfhVag51VQ
         jg4PtxefHG1QW39gafgfwXUCKyzp2YgvGxIAHEI5G8O1TEHWb3Kw0KnY9JJri1ZvQTba
         Gi9XT7L9meG/CiEZhK86cwJ3KodVKVy6P9isU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=h4L/kx7OE+ptflUSyiugwiN0V+J+rbpOIw5jmyv9PTKDP0eaymO00qHzm58H4ABJ9x
         cpcZH02eDICOow1QUYQenS0hCcscFuTtzyCBK7L8QYi3OQ0xQSoHaBClz3f6tygdLnUf
         34pttjDzhMuoAaa9PIwu9CjzJJrE4scvdykjU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4B221D13.2030806@earthlink.net>
References: <1260576611.20336.1239.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk>
	 <4B221D13.2030806@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 06:25:59 +1100
Message-ID: <11a6f2b10912121125ib901e4cnd9b5b18fa7e74b70@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] FreeMiNT & 68000
From: Paul Wratt <paul.wratt@gmail.com>
To: mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: paul.wratt@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:21 PM, josephus <dogbird@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> So I've fixed the bug that was preventing FreeMiNT booting on normal
>> ST's. But unfortunately, there's more kernel problems running programs.
>>
>> I'll need to tackle those next.
>>
>> Alan.
>>
> i am not sure but this is a document I have had for some time. it talks
> about optization for 68K in general.   it was something I had for a project.
> josephus
>

Thanks Alan, if I could help I would, maybe soon ...

And thanks for the doc Josephus.. you never know when those will come in handy..

Paul