From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Mon Dec 14 00:00:21 2009
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=qFQHDWIdOTWTGs++6EEm3vnPlMk5qLN6GetAoWmD2UE=;
        b=g59cFKMu2G0FV6yzrYDkO7ltBpghu+3iiCmYZBLcdcw+VDsv+qEV3s4nr0aMiqycpR
         zw5rC9CRbqcWd5rOH0m8fntKXT9Ube+gwtBVvwYiv1poE2jeIouRQEYh5/sLWhrkIMzA
         v0MePlaNB/RpVDt9xnAS3Kfs1XflryqUCnSj0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=aFcsMKBm7gUmTOwFDS4DKJ5QGPM7eHvg/Bbv93Yxpm4fw+rV9KAgv3/bHF9pNV2n4u
         TXZ/T7vuAfghDi0SDrCrzBjP198YPZ/BMfDYFFLGa5jL0QtM906Xo1S5l5xGpXYXxZM9
         wd58voFwcfejOWGDW0m6+3H2mxK+cKoeZie2s=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4B23D9B7.3903.22FCE8@rfburrows.ymail.com>
References: <0944D844-C44A-41C0-9835-EE146E4BEF16@gmail.com>
	 <4B23D9B7.3903.22FCE8@rfburrows.ymail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:58:32 +1100
Message-ID: <11a6f2b10912132058xb48492dx743cbd396a76c2e0@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Mintlib: Bindings for EsetShift() and VsetMask()
From: Paul Wratt <paul.wratt@gmail.com>
To: mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: paul.wratt@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Roger Burrows <rfburrows@ymail.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> On 12 Dec 2009 at 2:49, Peter Persson wrote:
>>
>> The current bindings for VsetMask() (falcon.h) and EgetShift() (osbind.h)
>> looks as follows:
>>
>> #define VsetMask(andmask,ormask)                                      \
>>       (short)trap_14_www((short)150,(short)(andmask),(short)(ormask))
>>
>> #define         EsetShift(mode)                                               \
>>       (void)trap_14_ww((short)(80),(short)mode)
>>
>>
>> According to the Atari Compendium and Tos.hyp, it should be as follows:
>>
>> #define VsetMask(andmask,ormask)                                      \
>>       (short)trap_14_www((short)150,(long)(andmask),(long)(ormask),(short)(overlay)
>> )
>>
>> #define         EsetShift(mode)                                               \
>>       (short)trap_14_ww((short)(80),(short)mode)
>>
>> I don't know which procedures are needed to get this into the CVS, but I guess
>> it could be a good idea to fix it..
>>
>
> Hmmm, according to my copy of the Compendium, the binding for VsetMask is:
>        void VsetMask(long ormask,long andmask,short overlay);
>
> The Compendium and the TT TOS release notes agree with your revision, i.e.:
>        short EsetShift(short mode);
>
> Regards,
> Roger
> P.S. Nice to see all this activity these days!
>
Thanks to Vincent documenting the CVS commit procedure..

Yes the activity is good, I am looking forward to the results of it..

Thanks you for your notes, these are essential for ironing out
potential and historical issues..

Cheers

Paul