From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Thu Dec 17 14:16:57 2009
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi
From: Eero Tamminen <oak@helsinkinet.fi>
Organization: Koti
To: Miro Kropacek <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] sources of oldstuff package
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:11:44 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
Cc: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
References: <c6533ef60912151541u15ca5bbdk73fcd65c1be72682@mail.gmail.com> <200912162059.28981.oak@helsinkinet.fi> <c6533ef60912161416m6f759cabja660da83462625c9@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c6533ef60912161416m6f759cabja660da83462625c9@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200912172111.44412.oak@helsinkinet.fi>
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: oak@helsinkinet.fi
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

Hi,

On Thursday 17 December 2009, Miro Kropacek wrote:
> > Because everything is linked to a single binary (and due to being
> > strictly size optimized), it could give quite a bit of disk usage
> > savings on MiNT lacking shared libs.
>
> Disk usage maybe but the loading time will be horrible. Now every tool
> would need to load ~1 MB instead of ~100 KB...

On Linux Busybox is only couple of hundred KB, I hope it wouldn't
be in megabyte size even with static linking, but it's a good point
nevertheless.

Even if MiNT doesn't support shared libraries, maybe it could
support sharing binaries in RAM (on machines having MMU)?

(I don't really know what current MiNT supports, I was using MiNT
in 90's, now I'm more of a mailing list lurker.)


> Another thing is some of 
> the most essential tools (like mentioned login, getty, init, networking
> tools like ifconfig) are hacked specially for mint -- there's some common
> basis but it's different code after all. Question is if it's still needed
> (i.e. if it's possible to take newest linux init/login/whatever and adapt
> it without too much effort or not).

Hm.  Now the distros are moving to Upstart (dependency based init
from Ubuntu).


Busybox is still nice for rescue operations as it fits onto a floppy and
provides most important tools.   First it should of course work with
MiNT though.   I was mainly wondering whether anybody has tried it...


	- Eero


