From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Mon Dec 14 15:43:39 2009 Message-ID: <4B26A2ED.3050208@online.no> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:41:17 +0100 From: Jo Even Skarstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "mint@lists.fishpool.fi" Subject: Re: [MiNT] patch:MiNT:KM_FREE References: <733893.001775385-sendEmail@descaro> <1260743976.20336.1266.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> <11a6f2b10912132224pd7cd8ag19eebe55fb24cd6f@mail.gmail.com> <11a6f2b10912132300q1c339eddh24588cdad7c81ec1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joska@online.no Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Helmut Karlowski skreiv: > Yes - I'm asking me this too - I'm not an expert on this. Today I had > the idea, fvdi should rather be an xdd than a km, because I think xdd > stands for extended device driver. Applications interface with xdd's through it's entry in the /dev filesystem. fVDI would have to work through a trap-handler (preferably the same as XaAES, to make it more efficient), which I don't think is very clean for a XDD. Jo Even