From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sun Dec 27 17:55:49 2009 Message-ID: <4B37E58C.8080105@freesbee.fr> Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:54:04 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vincent_Rivi=E8re?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "mint@lists.fishpool.fi" Subject: Re: [MiNT] patch:MiNT:KM_FREE References: <876828.589567111-sendEmail@descaro> <1261608023.16683.593.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> <4B32A4C5.7030905@freesbee.fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 091227-1, 27/12/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id nBRMtmN8005306 Helmut Karlowski wrote: > The questions for me is: Shall MiNT do the same as Linux? Certainly not. Linux is only a good source of inspiration, since it works well. Then we can decide what is good for us or not. The only question to ask when adding a new functionality is: will this be an incompatibility problem for the next versions ? In the case of your KM_FREE proposition, I don't think it is harmful for the future. So let's go ! -- Vincent Rivière