From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Dec 10 05:46:05 2009 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9oKw2H2PwCyVnBs2r0DxU8BYVjw0fm/JQzPsD9llj2Y=; b=Q11DHyMAPsr/nJisGA27ZtmOxvSXki7t3aKalDoGQySwp+xTgPVaUSL+2SriwgvgD5 cHbLIih7JcXyKsxFmJrW4Rigsrx7/5Or8kVS7BBmvQ+VXhmqlsJ12qVxrYGvriSu7xxO xEEqq0XiuODxFxihpwuIZgudSTB7CV190bIyY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=daYIsnNt3j2SGEZFj20Ut7fYmwQp5YHPadmAfT/3/2qqzzykbc5mxAAiWg2T6YDnoQ B4FbSSUzGcsKvz0hScqCXU+IfjlP8/r+eBxXvlLpAIyEShHLd2WtiA/ZqQYhowR5udjj XeYAydkyXRZ3gaEZkJ4bK6H6iXBBS6lD90Tqs= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B20CE9C.7080205@freesbee.fr> References: <11a6f2b10912100028l6bcb4671xafdac483b5caf82c@mail.gmail.com> <752526d20912100116n162523ecgb412973e2c51ca5f@mail.gmail.com> <4B20C0B5.5010007@freesbee.fr> <4B20CE9C.7080205@freesbee.fr> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:41:08 +0100 Message-ID: <752526d20912100241h49212127kef0d797bb085267@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [MiNT] XaAES modifications and clarification From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=E5re_Andersen?= To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vincent_Rivi=E8re?= Cc: mint Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: kareandersen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id nBAAjxtk001477 2009/12/10 Vincent Rivière : > Miro Kropacek a écrit : >> >>    The compiler consider a structure as defined after the closing >>    brace. So without a special artifice, a structure member can't refer >>    to itself, because the type has not been defined yet. >> >> Not true. At this time, compiler is already aware of the structure >> declaration. That declaration statement is useless. > > Shame on me, you are right, it works with GCC without the forward > declaration, even with the most strict options !?! > I will try on other compilers. > > All my convictions crumble... Haha, I am currently doing the same... At least its still not needed for gcc c89 - how about Atari compilers like PureC or Lattice? /Kåre