From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Dec 15 02:42:37 2009 Message-ID: From: "Jo Even Skarstein" To: "mint" References: <00042e27.019ad6d6377c@smtp.freeola.net> <11a6f2b10912142255q6d9224d6u65fc8a26107fa0e7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <11a6f2b10912142255q6d9224d6u65fc8a26107fa0e7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [MiNT] patch:MiNT:KM_FREE Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:40:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-EsetScannerBuild: 6215 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joska@online.no Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: -------------------------------------------------- From: "Paul Wratt" Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 7:55 AM To: "mint" Subject: Re: [MiNT] patch:MiNT:KM_FREE > With AES binding programs as child processes, it may in fact be > possible to run two odf them, It will be interesting to see how How? They both use the same TRAP, how do you want to direct the calls to the correct AES? And what would be the advantage of running more than one AES? Also, you need to have one physical workstation for each instance of the AES. > AVSERVER reacts to this, or can be accomodated. I have a raw AVSERVER > somewhere, of one of the uptodate ftps, it will probably work well in > this situation if loaded before and AES, as it does not have any > graphics stuff (desktop etc).. It won't work if loaded before the AES. An AV-server is an AES-application and thus needs a running AES. If you can solve the TRAP-problem, and the physical workstation problem, the AV-server will work just fine. But I still wonder what the purpose of this is. Jo Even __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4688 (20091215) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com