From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Fri Jan 8 13:12:18 2010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=B9UYFzWogs8igQgQKUOwU1TZUtAkVShAHDmlFdfZf0c=; b=UvGH0LnQ3RsxZDp2DlM5BcQ0/1Ys3le2M9ic6P0FgNCf4NjSJnPKUwnSTpjG20EMCR KBsH0toujnXE460YiVHOX2f75wbvuRqemDxNzWTGSdEnDWdyBEYSlzc2Je6Tz2iDysIz qah4Oz2ttrZlUbHr5WXe/a0Ry1zTze0N27rXQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QIhSCgdtbqRsFHuI8KXF92EkXTmIP4jorkDt7QPwIF+YF/tsxwaWfQG//0edf9c+lv JllNvqGu9T+UVJzKYpGbwlpFnEJisdSivqZy1ncT6CAjE3xTUsNBubOaUEHNrzYN569T 6nH55YwKZNY4AOApsyrHX+rWz8sygrQ4cWcmY= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B412056.8050107@chello.nl> References: <201001011533.o01FXxwV032211@mail.sparemint.org> <4B3E71C5.9070803@online.no> <4B3E7ADB.6050506@atari.org> <4B3F2275.2050506@online.no> <4B3FD0E2.3030703@chello.nl> <4B40613E.2030901@online.no> <4B412056.8050107@chello.nl> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:10:14 -0600 Message-ID: <11a6f2b11001081010j4600f543se0a7302489d5f4f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [MiNT] [Mint-cvs] [FreeMiNT CVS] freemint/sys/sockets/inet4 From: Paul Wratt To: mint Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: paul.wratt@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Henk Robbers wrote: > Jo Even Skarstein wrote: >> >> Helmut Karlowski wrote: >> >>> Am 03.01.2010, 00:04 Uhr, schrieb Henk Robbers : >>> >>> >>>> On my todo list is compiling MiNT and XaAES. >>>> I probably start on MiNT 1.15.12 and XaAES2002. >>>> The first because it is the last stable release, >>>> the latter because it is a Pure C program and I know it. >>> why would you not use 1.16.3 as your start point, which is stable, or is there something wrong with it? BTW, just headup on compile time, I use ARAnyM on 3GHz machine with 512Mb RAM, config uses 64Mb FastRAM, and EasyMiNT seemst to rate the CPU at 75Mhz, it still latkes about 50 minutes to compile 1.16.3. Note that he grater part is actually the XaAES compilation stage, which is why I have broken out the gradients, and created recolor script for re compile one or two .O files, then reassemble all into binary. >>> Do you plan to provide a cli-version of AHCC? >> >> >> There is already a ttp-version of AHCC. >> > > Indeed, there is. But I cannot run it. > So it is untested. > Why, I have used it with ARAnyM. mind you that is only with 1.16.3 atm I have used and tested the command line version, which is functionally identical to GUI version, including the project compiler. You must remember that Henk has no love for the command line, and has told me off already for suggesting that I myself make some additions to it. :) >From AHCC GUI point of view tho, the idea is to get the project file to do all the work, not the command line (as such) > It is however exactly the same compiler as is called > by the GEM version. The called version is passed a true Unix > cammandline internally which is then parsed as if it was > indeed a commandline from a commandline shell. > > If you run the GEM version with verbosity, the passed commandline > is displayed in the journal. So you can see what is working. > I dont know if multiple input files work. > The called compiler always gets only 1 input file. > I also dont know how well it works with relative paths. > > In the GEM version locations where to look for include files > are derived from the full path of the compiler and the full path > of the project file. > > -- > Groeten; Regards. > Henk Robbers. http://members.chello.nl/h.robbers You should be able to run it with the Venus/Gemini shell, M??? (can remember the name atm), without using desktop replacement. It is considered the best console shell on the Atari ST (bash being GCC/GNU friendly only) BTW, I find the GEM dev environment to be awkward to use in AHCC, so it was my plan to wait until you Henk had added v4e support then rip the interface to pieces and re assemble it with some rapid dev type IDE additions, similar to say the Java based IDE on linux/win (also can remember the name), the one whioch promised v4e support. and enhanced IDE or rapid dev tool does not make a lot of sence if you already have a working setup, and limited screen space, but these are not part of an ARAnyM setup, and wont be on and v4e either (nor CTPCI or Super Videl) As much as I think it would be nice to get the source for Resource Master to be placed in GPL or similar, I think that atm at least, a command line resource builder would be more useful atm, as there is not one that can do all RSM or Interface can (including icons). This is one of my top proiorites of programming, along with IDE and or rapid dev app. I have an idea to document and package a IDE configurator that allows quick integration into various AV desktops, especially for compiling and editing sources, as I know there are people who have working setups, however I still see a longer term need for a dev app that can do both AHCC/PureC etc AND GCC/GNU Some default source that provides PureC, AHCC and GCC compatible source out of the box would be nice also. I believe that even tho the previous mention IDE is Java based, it has rukles for syntax check, which could be used to allow inclusion and completion, specifically to generate cross compiler compatible source.. so it may still be an option, as I have a newer version of kafine/kaffe that should port OK, and I believe I have the other libraries required, this may be a while in coming from me tho... I have to get through the current round of we stuff first, and submit a patch or 2 to XaAES cvs Paul